18 - Let's play a game!


You know the deal. You're at work. Most of the internet is blocked off when you're at work. Facebook is inaccessible, YouTube is off-limits and even Pathetic Motorways can't be clicked on.

But Wikipedia... ah, Wikipedia, my old friend. How you've guided me through hours, days, weeks of procrastination and helped me to learn about things I never even knew existed. Or knew could ever exist. Or wanted to know.

I've made edits, I've read about everything from World War I to Margaret Thatcher to The Importance of Being Earnest, and I've clicked and clicked and clicked. The hyperlinks from one page to another are fantastic, and often lead you down paths far, far away from that which you wanted to progress (work, for one thing).

So, let's play a little game. The idea in this is to go to a random Wikipedia page (if you so desire, there's a Random Article link on the left hand side in the navigation pane). When I clicked, it took me to Buków, which is a town in Poland.

When you have your random page, click on the first hyperlink in the main text, not any italic text which appears above the lead paragraph (for me, this was Poland). Then keep clicking the first hyperlink that links to a proper wikipedia article (i.e. not Wiktionary or Help pages, or any outside website) until you get to a page you've seen before in the chain or you reach a page which has no hyperlinks (this is unlikely, but possible).

For example, the Buków-Poland chain went like this:

Which is where the chain ends. Sadly, this one didn't really turn out as well as I was hoping. All language-based. Let's try another.

...Hang on a minute - this one ends with philosophy too! This one was awesome, covering systems and software, collecting and physics, before ending up back on philosophy again.

In fact, all of the following random articles ended up on the philosophy page:

This finding is, I believe, incredible.

It is also worth noting, that if one does the opposite, and takes the last Wikipedia hyperlink in an article (ignoring any "See also" and reference sections - using the main body text only), then going from Philosophy, one ends up eventually getting to the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season which cycles between itself and the 2004 season.

In summary, then, Chew's law states:

All Wikipedia first links tend towards the Philosophy page

There. Now, get back to work.

P.S. If anyone finds a first-link route which is either fascinating or doesn't end at the Philosophy page, then please post it in the comments page and I shall add your addendum to Chew's law.

Another one

I also found

Advertising -> Internet marketing -> Marketing -> Advertising

Which is fairly stable, but (again) probably not quite as stable as the philosophy one. I think that this could be down to Latin or Greek being the stem of a lot of words, and the etymology for a particular word is often the first thing mentioned in an article,

Landform

Landform -> Geomorphology -> landform

and no sneaky editing one of those pages to send the loop towards philosophy!

although it should be noted that whereas Philosophy and ethics are a fairly stable limit cycle - if you accidentally click a different link from either of those pages, you are fairly likely to return back to the ethics/philosophy loop - the Geomorphology/Landform is not a stable one

just in case you were wondering - it was my roommate that found this, not me

Lingo